Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 59% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10400F - 587 vs 369 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $99.95 vs $469.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900KF - $0.27 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
587
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
33%
Price, $
$469.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1824 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
369
62%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |