Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-6100 - 412 vs 341 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $100.0 vs $453.59
- Up to 74% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-13900KF - $0.29 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
412
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
26%
Price, $
$453.59
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $453.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |