Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 1105 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 15% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G3900 - 133 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2500X - $39.9 vs $106.47
- Up to 57% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen 5 2500X - $0.34 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
116
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |