Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1105 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2500X - 169 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2500X - $99.9 vs $106.47
- Up to 8% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2500X - $0.59 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |