Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is 2533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than FX-8320 - 269 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - $95.0 vs $150.99
- Up to 32% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - $0.38 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
FPS
269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
67.85714285714285%
Price, $
$150.99
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37541 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
252
93.68029739776952%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37535 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |