Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 61 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil Village than Ryzen 3 3250U - 301 vs 294 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 7th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Renoir |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP |
| No | Overclockable | No |
