Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 921 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 3250U - 162 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 64 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Picasso | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
