Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 1946 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 15 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen 3 3250U - 93 vs 85 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 24 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Picasso | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |