Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $69.82 vs $521.66
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 60% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 3200G - 85 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $69.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75916 minutes ago
Buy for $521.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
34.83443708609272%
Multi-Core
3013
16.49151614668856%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |