Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-6100 - 295 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $100.0 vs $529.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-14900F - $0.43 vs $1.8 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14125 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |