Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1436 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $81.14 vs $189.95
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 3200G - 59 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $81.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
71.08108108108108%
Multi-Core
3013
61.52746579538493%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |