Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2790 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240 - 188 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $41.0 vs $94.99
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.24 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4392 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |