Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 50 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 6% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 133 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $53.55 vs $130.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.43 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
43.87755102040816%
Price, $
$130
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1826 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
93.98496240601504%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1826 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
61.785356068204614%
Multi-Core
1051
36.7739678096571%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |