Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $65.23 vs $225.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-10700F - $0.33 vs $1.09 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 1300X - 208 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
200
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
30%
Price, $
$225.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |