Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6300 - 180 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $74.04 vs $225.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-10700F - $0.49 vs $1.26 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
38%
Price, $
$225.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14605 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14604 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |