Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1328 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $65.23 vs $165.86
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-11600KF - $0.39 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 3 1300X - 220 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 12 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
167
75%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7757 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
52%
Price, $
$165.86
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |