Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 5031 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 20% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $39.99 vs $49.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing God of War than Celeron G6900 - $0.25 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 11% better in God of War than Phenom X4 9650 - 177 vs 160 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
160
90.3954802259887%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3704 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
89.28571428571428%
Price, $
$49.99
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3715 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
14.847161572052403%
Multi-Core
765
28.375370919881306%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |