Buy on Amazon
$189.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2714 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 8% better in Dota 2 than Phenom X4 9550 - 171 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $39.9 vs $189.95
- Up to 81% better value when playing Dota 2 than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.23 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
158
92.39766081871345%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
19.166666666666668%
Price, $
$189.95
21%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 2.2GHz 4x512KB Socket AM2+ Quad-Core CPU - CPU ONLY
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4006 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4011 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
40.27538726333907%
Multi-Core
712
71.7741935483871%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
