Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $39.9 vs $249.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-12700F - $0.21 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G3900 - 226 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10149 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
18%
Price, $
$249.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |