Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900F - 199 vs 181 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $225.0 vs $249.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-12700F - $1.24 vs $1.26 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
98%
Price, $
$249.99
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |