Key Differences
In short — Core i7-920 outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-920 is 84 days older than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom II X4 810 - 107 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Deneb | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |