Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 2395 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom II X4 810 - 127 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Deneb | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |