Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 4098 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Escape From Tarkov than Phenom II X4 810 - 213 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 12 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4379 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |