Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3620 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Phenom II X4 810 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |