Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2668 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Phenom II X4 810 - 120 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4899 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Deneb | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |