Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8320E vs Core i9-10900K

FX-8320E vs Core i9-10900K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD FX-8320E

3.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD FX-8320E Logo
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77142 minutes ago

vs

AMD FX-8320E

3.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD FX-8320E Logo
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77142 minutes ago

vs

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2067 days newer than FX-8320E.

Advantages of AMD FX-8320E

  • Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K

  • Performs up to 41% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-8320E - 83 vs 59 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 20 vs 8 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Cyberpunk 2077.
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

RT Overdrive

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


FPS

59

71.08433734939759%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$178.02

100%

AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77142 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-10900K Logo
Core i9-10900K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

83

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

FPS Winner

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

RT Overdrive

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014

Intel Core i9-10900K Logo
Core i9-10900K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


Single-Core

443

25.328759291023438%

Multi-Core

1680

18.33460656990069%

Intel Core i9-10900K Logo
Core i9-10900K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1749

100%

Multi-Core

9163

100%

AMD FX-8320E Logo

AMD FX-8320E

vs
Intel Core i9-10900K Logo

Intel Core i9-10900K

Sep 2nd, 2014Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
FXCollectionCore i9
VisheraCodenameComet Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8Cores
10
8Threads
20
3.2 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.7 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz
95 W
TDP125 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.0xMultiplier
37.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using FX-8320E or Core i9-10900K

Cyberpunk 2077, 1920 x 1080, RT Overdrive

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.