Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3046 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $178.02 vs $899.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-13400F - $1.1 vs $4.81 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 15% better in God of War than FX-8320E - 187 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.81/FPS
22%
Price, $
$899.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |