Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F and the cheaper Core i3-13100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-13100 - 672 vs 668 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $138.98 vs $899.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - $0.21 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
15%
Price, $
$899.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13380 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
668
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $138.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13381 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |