Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 364 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than FX-8320E - 706 vs 672 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than FX-8320E - $100.0 vs $178.02
- Up to 46% better value when playing Rocket League than FX-8320E - $0.14 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13638 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
706
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13639 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |