Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $95.0 vs $379.91
- Up to 1% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i9-13900K - $1.98 vs $2.0 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 296% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-8320 - 190 vs 48 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
48
25.263157894736842%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3665 minutes ago
Buy for $379.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3674 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |