Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 and the cheaper FX-8320 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 5% cheaper than FX-8350 - $175.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8350 - $0.74 vs $0.77 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - 240 vs 236 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2949 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2949 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |