Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $82.02 vs $360.95
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8150 - 166 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
Buy for $360.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |