Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $64.03 vs $230.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700K - $0.56 vs $1.68 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8150 - 137 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2622 minutes ago
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |