Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-4930K - 135 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $98.0 vs $247.01
- Up to 52% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-10700K - $0.88 vs $1.83 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
48%
Price, $
$247.01
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $247.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10443 minutes ago
Buy for $98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10437 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |