Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 25% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8300 - 193 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $112.02 vs $230.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-10700K - $0.72 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12312 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |