Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460T outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4460T is 871 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-4460T - $39.99 vs $52.87
- Up to 7% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-4460T - $0.28 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Performs up to 20% better in F1 23 than FX-8120 - 174 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15696 minutes ago
Buy for $52.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15695 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |