Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1522 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 141% better in League of Legends than FX-4350 - 140 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 64 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | EPYC |
| Vishera | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
