Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 497 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-4350 - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 85 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
