Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-4300 vs Core i5-13600K

FX-4300 vs Core i5-13600K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD FX-4300

3.8 GHz | 4-core

AMD FX-4300 Logo
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 3.8 GHz 4 MB Cache Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4300WMW4MHK Socket AM3+

Buy for $48.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4639 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-13600K

3.5 GHz | 14-core

Intel Core i5-13600K Logo
Intel Core i5-13600K Desktop Processor 14 (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) with Integrated Graphics - Unlocked

Buy for $268.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4639 minutes ago

AMD FX-4300

3.8 GHz | 4-core

AMD FX-4300 Logo
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 3.8 GHz 4 MB Cache Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4300WMW4MHK Socket AM3+

Buy for $48.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4639 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-13600K

3.5 GHz | 14-core

Intel Core i5-13600K Logo
Intel Core i5-13600K Desktop Processor 14 (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) with Integrated Graphics - Unlocked

Buy for $268.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4639 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.

Advantages of AMD FX-4300

  • Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $48.02 vs $268.99
  • Up to 76% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13600K - $0.42 vs $1.72 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K

  • Performs up to 36% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-4300 - 156 vs 115 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 20 vs 4 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Dying Light 2: Stay Human.
Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

AMD FX-4300 Logo
FX-4300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

115

73%

Value, $/FPS

$0.42/FPS

100%

Price, $

$48.02

100%

Value Winner

AMD FX-Series FX-4300 3.8 GHz 4 MB Cache Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4300WMW4MHK Socket AM3+

Buy for $48.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4639 minutes ago

Intel Core i5-13600K Logo
Core i5-13600K

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022


FPS

156

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.72/FPS

24%

Price, $

$268.99

17%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-13600K Desktop Processor 14 (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) with Integrated Graphics - Unlocked

Buy for $268.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4639 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

AMD FX-4300 Logo
FX-4300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Intel Core i5-13600K Logo
Core i5-13600K

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-4300 Logo
FX-4300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

448

16%

Multi-Core

1090

7%

Intel Core i5-13600K Logo
Core i5-13600K

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022


Single-Core

2665

100%

Multi-Core

14848

100%

AMD FX-4300 Logo

AMD FX-4300

vs
Intel Core i5-13600K Logo

Intel Core i5-13600K

Oct 23rd, 2012Release Date
Sep 27th, 2022
FXCollectionCore i5
VisheraCodenameRaptor Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
14
4Threads
20
3.8 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.5 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.1 GHz
95 W
TDP125 W
32 nmProcess Size
10 nm
19.0xMultiplier
35.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using FX-4300 or Core i5-13600K

Dying Light 2: Stay Human, 1920 x 1080, High Quality Raytracing

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.