Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1773 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $48.02 vs $109.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.27 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than FX-4300 - 182 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
45%
Price, $
$109.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |