Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1100 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $22.92 vs $99.9
- Up to 74% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-6700T - $0.05 vs $0.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than FX-4130 - 526 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |