Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 814 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3250 - 182 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $56.34 vs $99.9
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6700T - $0.33 vs $0.55 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12413 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
169
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12412 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |