Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 2244 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $22.92 vs $160.91
- Up to 83% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-9400 - $0.05 vs $0.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 26% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-4130 - 556 vs 440 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |