Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2803 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $22.92 vs $92.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-10100 - $0.17 vs $0.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 32% better in Dirt 5 than FX-4130 - 182 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Buy for $92.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |