Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3240T - 205 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $25.7 vs $68.99
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75514 minutes ago
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75512 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
31.34642356241234%
Multi-Core
971
23.036773428232504%
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |