Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1741 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 29% better in Need For Speed Unbound than EPYC 7551P - 169 vs 131 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Naples | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
