Buy on Amazon
$39.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1650 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 30% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EPYC 7551 - 391 vs 301 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
391
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Naples | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
