Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 1760 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i3-3240 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Naples | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |