Buy on Amazon
$30
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 1852 days newer than Pentium G640.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 6% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G640 - 236 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor G640 2.8 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G640
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
| EPYC | Collection | Pentium |
| Naples | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
