Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 1767 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-4130 - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
EPYC | Collection | FX |
Naples | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |